One of the first articles I published here discussed the inexplicable blood clots allegedly being found within the vaccinated by embalmers across the world. I focused on this because:•Having a visual image one can viscerally feel is typically one of the most effective ways to convince people that a controversial subject exists and that they should care about it.

•Since there was no established mechanism to explain how this could be possible, that was used as a reason to debunk the possibility it existed. In turn, since I had a viable mechanism to explain what was forming these clots, I felt it was important for our movement to get that explanation out there.•I originally created this publication because I wanted to bring awareness to a specific issue I felt was critical for everyone to learn about (that the trucker protests against the mandates were essentially mirroring what had happened over a century ago with the smallpox vaccines). At the time that happened, I spent months trying to get someone else to publish it on their platform, and eventually self-published it as a last ditch effort because nothing else worked. Because of this (and how fortunate I was that my message ended up being heard), I really want to help people who are in the same position I was. In turn, when a group of readers here asked me if I could publicize their attempts to prove the clots were occurring, I was more than happy to oblige and promised to do so once it was completed.

Recently, they completed a second version of their survey so today I am publishing a follow up to my original discussion of their results (which incorporates everything we have learned since their first one).

Note: when I first started this Substack, the majority of America supported the vaccines (e.g., around 80% got at least one dose), whereas now, numerous polls have found that: approximately 50% of America believes the vaccines are unsafe or ineffective, approximately 50% believe the vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths and around 25% have either been injured by them or know someone who was. I believe the visceral understanding of this issue which was provided by these clots played a pivotal role in shifting the public’s perception on these products.

What Are These Clots?

These blood clots attracted the public’s attention because their long elastic quality was very different from what was typically observed within the body. Since many videos of these clots exist, I will share two of the best (and concise) ones I’ve come across.The first was a discussion with Ryan Cole on the Highwire which provided proof they do indeed exist and discussed exactly what was within them:

The second video was recently shared on Twitter by the embalmer who played a pivotal role in bringing the public’s attention to this.

When I first wrote about these clots, I argued that two separate processes were at work.1. Normally, the body continually forms and then breaks down fibrin clots, but once they become misfolded, the enzymes the body uses to break the clots down no longer “fit,” and hence can’t break them down. Since the spike protein causes proteins to misfold (either due to its prion domain or its effect on the physiologic zeta potential), researchers had discovered that the presence of the spike protein caused misfolded fibrin clots to form that gradually collected on the walls of containers designed to simulate living blood vessels. I thus reasoned that if this process continued, it would result in larger and larger clots forming which would eventually match the shape of the blood vessels they encased them. That model has since become the accepted explanation for those amyloid clots.

2. Zeta potential governs if substances suspended in a fluid remain apart or clump together. One of the most consequential effects of zeta potential is the effect of blood cells in the body, as once zeta potential becomes impaired, they clump together. In turn, since both the spike protein, and the vaccine lipid nanoparticles contain a positive charge which impairs zeta potential, many videos exist of blood rapidly clumping together from the vaccine. This I believe accounts for the microclots that have been repeatedly observed in the blood after vaccination and after embalming corpses.

Finally, one of the most comprehensive videos I’ve seen on this topic (which included interviewing two embalmers) can be found within this video by Chris Martenson.

Note: I know that many of the individuals who are treating vaccine injuries are now finding it important to measure the levels of amyloid clots in the blood in their patients (and I in turn have seen the therapies I know of which can eliminate these clots clinically improve vaccine injured patients). However, at this point, I am not certain if the fibrous clots are the primary cause of sudden death in the vaccinated individuals as other mechanisms like myocarditis, endothelial damage and more traditional blood clots (or microclots) could also explain what is happening. Nonetheless, as stated above, I believe these clots are an extremely important point to discuss since they are something everyone can relate to and hence want something to be done about it.

How Can We Know If the Clots Exist?

One of the most common strategies the ruling class uses to control the population is to establish a rigid series of hierarchies in the society and then buy out every party at the top of the hierarchy, as this provides a fairly cost-effective way to monopolize truth within the society (e.g., you can only practice medicine if you have a medical license, the public is taught to highly trust whatever doctors tell them, and a lot of work is invested to assure that doctors comply with the dictates of medical industry).

For example, we have been conditioned to believe news is not credible unless it comes from an authoritative source (e.g., a major news outlet). As you might expect, almost all the media companies in this country are owned by six corporations, their CEOs all belong to similar groups (e.g., the World Economic Forum) and they consistently only promote the ruling class’s narrative regardless of how much it flies in the face of reality.

Similarly, we have been conditioned to believe science is only valid if it is endorsed by a credible scientific publication, but since those publications are funded by industry they will only report results which support their sponsors. This in turn resulted in an almost complete censorship of the harms of the COVID-19 vaccine throughout the scientific literature and ridiculous (and sometimes overtly fraudulent) articles being published which debunked the use of any competing treatment for COVID-19 (e.g., ivermectin and hydroxycholorquine).

Because of how over-the-top the censorship was during COVID-19, the public realized how much we were being exploited by these monopolies and attempted to find ways to get to the truth that were outside this rigid hierarchy. That for example is why the alternative media took off during the pandemic (and reciprocally why many “professional” journalists are now being laid off). Likewise, independent science flourished as many citizens realized the only way the data on the dangers of the vaccines could get out was if the medical journals were bypassed entirely.Note: I recently published an article which provided the wealth of evidence that COVID-19 vaccine shedding is affecting a sizable number people, the common patterns of injury observed and scientific mechanisms that explain how it’s occurring. In turn, the most common rebuttal we receive is “if this was real a peer-reviewed study would have been done to prove it, and since it hasn’t been, it’s a hoax.” As it turns out, it actually was—money was raised to fund a trial where a significant number of unvaccinated women were exposed to vaccinated individuals, after which it was found that the majority of those unvaccinated women developed menstrual abnormalities. The authors of that trial (which I’ve reviewed) have since been trying to get a peer-reviewed journal to publish their results but have been stuck in the process for months. This is what frequently happens to controversial studies which go against the narrative and hence a key reason why we often can’t rely upon the scientific literature. 

Since admitting the existence of those fibrous clots would also be extremely damaging for the vaccine narrative, it was a forgone conclusion no medical journal would publish anything on the subject. Fortunately, a group of citizen scientists led by former USAF Major Tom Haviland (who was forced to retire after 16 years of post-military work as an electrical engineer for a defense contractor because of Biden’s vaccine mandate) decided to take on the project themselves and trust the alternative media would promote what they found.

The Embalmer’s Survey

Their idea was relatively simple, put together a detailed survey about the blood clots, send it to embalmers around the country (along with individuals outside the United States) and see what they said. In the first go of this last year, 800 Funeral homes were contacted along with 30 State Funeral Directors Associations who were asked to forward the survey to their members, while in the second go, 1,700 Funeral homes and 50 state or national associations were emailed.

Not surprisingly, this resulted in more responses coming from the Midwest (as people there were not as ideologically committed to defending the vaccines).

Note: Haviland observed in 2023 that after emailing everyone he initially received only 14 responses. This led him to directly contacting the 30 presidents of state embalming associations he had already sent the survey to (who all politely blew him off). After this, over the next two days, he received a deluge of responses from PA (due to their association breaking from the herd to do the right thing and forwarding the survey to their members who thus felt safe to answer it). This suggests that there is an orchestrated effort to cover everything up by the leaders of this industry, but many individual embalmers want to speak out about what they are seeing and will if they feel it is safe for them to (consider their anonymous comments near the end of this article). Likewise, a year ago I corresponded with one embalmer who privately shared that she was seeing these clots but did not feel safe publicly speaking out about them.

This response Haviland received from the executive director of the funeral association in British Columbia (Canada) helps to illustrate how many feathers got ruffled by his survey:

For reference, this is an example of the letter each surveyed participant received:

Additionally, following credentials were provided:

The full results of those surveys can be viewed here:

As the results were compelling (and as Hirschman demonstrated above the blood clots have not gone away), this inspired Haviland’s team to redo the survey this year and again share the results. This was an important step because one of the key standards for determining truth in science is “reproducibility” and if the results were consistent, that would strengthen the case this is indeed a real phenomenon.

2022 vs. 2023

As you can see, these results are relatively consistent, which indicates suggests this really happening. Additionally, it appears the clots have gotten a bit rarer, which would be expected since the vaccination rate is decreasing and some of those who had the clots are now deceased.

Now let’s look at the other results.

The 2022 Survey

These results suggests the clots were due to the spike protein and more likely to be caused by the vaccines (as they put more of the spike protein into the body than COVID-19).

The jugular and femoral veins are the most common sites embalmers use to access the body which is why the fibrous clots are likely predominantly being observed there. Additionally a good case can be made that jugular vein and iliac vein (which the femoral vein feeds into) being compressed leads to a variety of chronic illnesses (e.g., the documentary in this article discusses how jugular vein obstruction can lead to MS while this article discusses how iliac vein compression is commonly seen in COVID vaccine injuries).

Note: this refers to the “other” question in the previous survey questions about the location of the clots.

While not quite the same question, these answers are somewhat consistent with each other and suggest that the increase in traditional blood clots was at least in part due to COVID-19 infections.

The 2023 Survey

Note: this question unfortunately did not have a comparative to 2019 and earlier.

Note: there is some evidence to link each of the causes of infant deaths listed to the COVID-19 vaccines. Conversely, there is a lot of evidence (spanning a century) linking sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) to the routine childhood vaccines, which led many to correctly predict that the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns would lead to an unprecedented drop in SIDS (which was subsequently also confirmed by the FL infant death rate dropping in 2021 because distrust over the COVID vaccines made Florida parents skip routine childhood vaccinations). Because of these two competing trends and all infant deaths being compared between 2019 to 2023, it’s hard to interpret this data. Nonetheless, an overall increase in deaths did appear to result from COVID vaccination.

The final question from the 2023 survey is probably one of the most interesting ones to ponder (as there are a variety of ways to interpret it).

Survey Comments

Haviland also provided the option for respondents to give free text responses and presented every single one of them. I notated the ones I felt were the most important.

Conclusion

Given how many people are seeing these clots and how much concern still exists about them, it is remarkable that our entire scientific apparatus has blacklisted any research being conducted on it. On one hand I think this degree of censorship is tragic, but on the other, I see it as arguably being a good thing since the misconduct by the scientific establishment has been so egregious, it has started to encourage the public break free from their information monopoly.

For example, prior to COVID-19, the average article in the top medical journals received around 10,000 views, while during the pandemic, COVID-19 related articles experienced a traffic spike and averaged an unprecedented 117,341 views per article. In contrast, Hirschman’s video got 20,500,000 views (and even a nobody like me gets between 50,000-150,000 views per article).This is almost identical to the loss in viewership the mainstream media is facing as the alternative media eclipses it. For example, the major networks receive between 400,000 to 3,000,000 views during prime time, yet Tucker Carlson’s interviews with Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Javier Milei, and Victor Orban over the last six months have each received between 100-400 million impressions (making each one arguably the most watched interview in history).Note: while Tucker is presently the most successful independent broadcaster, he’s not the only person who receives more views than the media conglomerates (e.g., Joe Rogan does too).

All of us believe that the mainstream media is between a rock and a hard place—to survive it needs to do real journalism and publish the truth to regain its viewers, but if it does that, then it will lose the corporate sponsorship which sustains the industry (e.g., by bribing the media through advertisement money to not cover stories which cast its sponsors in a bad light). I believe this is identical to what’s happening with the scientific press (which likewise will never cover stories which threaten the pharmaceutical sponsors who fund the medical journals).

If you take a step back, it is incredulous to believe no one is covering the biggest news story of our time, the “unexplained” spike in excessive death. To put that into context,. in the first 9 months of 2023, 158,000 Americans who should still be alive died—which for reference is significantly greater than the total number American deaths from every war America has been involved in since World War 2.

On one hand, that the media’s unwillingness to cover this illustrates just how much the corrosive corruption within our society has been allowed to fester. On the other, it also illustrates the cyclical nature of society; once corruption goes too far, it eventually inspires a public revolt (e.g., people abandoning both the scientific and popular press).Note: the CDC has instead opted to stop providing “COVID related” excess death data, while the UK government agency responsible for calculating excess deaths recently changed their formula and amazingly discovered that by this new formula there in fact aren’t any excess deaths. One of the most important things for us to do now is make sure that these deaths (and those clots) don’t become normalized and largely forgotten, something which frequently happens when a new disease emerges that has a “politically inconvenient” cause.In turn, I believe we are presently in the situation foretold by the classic fable the goose that laid the golden eggs. Like the owners of that goose (who not satisfied with the prosperity the single golden egg it laid each day decided to cut it open and extract all of them—only to discover none were inside) I believe the pharmaceutical industry shot itself in the foot by allowing their unchecked greed throughout the pandemic to facilitate conduct that was so egregious it awoke the general public to their predatory businesses model and hence “killed their golden goose.”

I am thus immensely grateful that the independent journalism and science (that was needed to replace the corruption pervading our society) was able to flourish throughout COVID-19, and I thank each of you for doing your part to help make that possible. Were it not for a large contingent of the public (e.g., you) helping support the independent voices, dedicated individuals like Haviland, and brave whistleblowers (e.g., embalmers Richard Hirschman, Anna Foster, funeral home directors John O'Looney and Chad Whisnat, and the countless people who spoke out about what actually happened within the COVID-19 vaccine trials) none of it could have ever happened.Note: each of the above names links to an interview where the whistleblower discusses what they were seeing.

For those of you who would like to support Haviland’s work, please consider tuning into a live broadcast on the Highwire at 1PM CST today (two hours from now) where he will present it with Del Bigtree [now that the broadcast is finished, it can be viewed on Twitter here].

This post is public so feel free to share it.